Gibson vs PRS: Which Brand is Right for You?

Back in the early days of electric guitar, in the '50s and the '60s, there have been only a handful of guitar brands to choose from. What's more, in some areas, guitar lovers were only limited to one or two particular brands. That began changing during the '70s and the '80s, and today we are able to choose from countless brands models, ranging from the cheapest to the most expensive ones.

However, the same old brands have remained dominant in the market with Fender and Gibson still being in the lead, with some other great manufacturers, like PRS, also taking over a certain portion of the market. Due to some similarities, Gibson and PRS have often been somewhat of competitors, with the latter dipping in and taking over some of the Gibson lovers on their side. Here, we will be looking at Gibson and PRS guitars and discussing some of their differences, ultimately helping you decide which might suit you more.

Now, before we start, we need to point out that both of these brands have made great guitars over the years and that this will come down to personal preferences.

Differences between Gibson and PRS

Aside from some basic similarities, with both companies having single and double cutaway guitars, as well as the fact that most of their instruments feature the double humbucker configuration, there are some differences in general specs that should be considered. First off, the headstocks of most Gibson guitars are at a bigger angle, sometimes even up to 17 degrees. In addition, these necks are made from one piece of wood, making the headstocks at such an angle vulnerable and more prone to unwanted cracks and breaks. However, such a design has been praised for giving more sustain and countless guitar players over the years have stuck to Gibson for this reason.

When it comes to PRS, the headstock is not at such a big angle as compared to an average Gibson Les Paul or an SG. Aside from that, the average PRS, let's take an SE for example, will have different layout of tuners. This way, the strings go almost in a straight line from the tuner, over the nut, and all the way to the bridge. As for Gibson, the strings are at an angle between the tuners and the nut, which affects the tone in a positive way but might cause some tuning issues.

While we're at headstocks, on PRS guitars, they are made from two pieces of wood, and they're put together by a scarf joint. While some might argue that this kind of design might reduce sustain, this clearly provides players with much less fear of the headstock breaking off from even minor hits.

Furthermore, pretty much all of the Gibson guitars you can find out there have Mahogany bodies and Mahogany necks, and quite often you'll find them to have Maple tops. The PRS guitars have a bit more versatility both in the choice of wood and the design. Scale length on a standard PRS will be a bit bigger, and the necks might have a bit thinner profile, something that might work better with those who are more into "shreddier" type of playing.

When it comes to the pickups, both companies have great stuff on them and there's an abundance of great options to choose from and this usually comes down to personal preference. All the electronics are also pretty well done for both of these brands, so there are no worries there. However, you will more often stumble upon a PRS that has a coil-split option, even in the cheaper range. As opposed to Gibson which are usually all with the 3-way switches on them.


Overall, you can't really go wrong with either Gibson or PRS. However, it should be noted that at an entry level, for those cheaper models, it's advisable to go with PRS. While cheaper Gibson models are great, they do tend to be overpriced for the quality and the features that you get. A cheaper PRS might even be half the price of an entry-level Gibson, yet it will provide players with the same, if not better, quality.

As for the higher-end guitars, there's a lot of stuff to consider, depending on what you're into. Gibson might be a bit too pricy here, but the quality of work usually justifies it, although there are certain models to stay away from. When it comes to standard Les Pauls and SGs, the classic Standard, Studio, or Custom models are definitely worth it.

With all this said, it's probably the best idea that you go out there and try both Gibson and PRS guitars. Playing them and feeling them in your own hands will do you more than countless hours of online research. The differences explained above might just give you a rough estimate as to what you might enjoy more.

Older Post
Newer Post

1 comment

  • I love the Santana Core Retro…unfortunately all PRS huitars resale value is not very good…and I cannot find any spare parts for PRS…guitars do break…I cannot even buy saddles for the Prs Tremolo Bridge..what happens if I lose the trem bar?…or crack the trussrod cover…or lose the trem springs..or crack the tone parts so I am not willing to pay 4600 u.s dollars for a guitar that I cannot find parts for…I live in Indonesia..Gibsons holds their value..even a 5 years old Standard and Traditonal…R9 Custom Shops only loses 400 bucks for a 2010 model Mint..and parts are plenty…


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

Close (esc)

Get Our Free eBook!

Do you love dirt as much as we do? Learn the rich history behind all the overdrive and distortion pedals you know and love. Download our free ebook, The History of Guitar Distortion.

Age verification

By clicking enter you are verifying that you are old enough to consume alcohol.


Shopping Cart

Your cart is currently empty.
Shop now